Analyzing the Knowledge Practices of the ACRL Framework (Part I)

Part I. Authority is Constructed and Contextual

Okay, I have completed the analysis of the set of knowledge practices for the “Authority is Constructed and Contextual” frame.

My first thought was that most of the knowledge practices in this frame read more like knowledge competencies. A knowledge practice represents “knowing in action,” so should describe a behavior or action that is observable, whether formally or informally. In this frame, most of the knowledge practices are written more in terms of cognitive processes. I don’t particularly like that because I think there is a big difference between someone who can intellectually describe what they SHOULD do, and actually practice what they preach (I think a lot of students fit this description).

So, the “knowing in action” column in the table below remedies that by describing actual practices or behaviors that an information literate student should participate in. And they are broadly written to be applicable across most disciplines.

My other thought — the problem solving facet of IL didn’t really fit any of these knowledge practices. I’m not sure if that’s problematic. I’m reserving judgment for when the full analysis has been completed.

I have also included some straightforward strategies for fostering these knowledge practices (hopefully, you will find them useful).

Authority is Constructed and Contextual

Knowledge Practice
IL Facet
Knowing in Action
Instructional Strategies
Define different types of authority such as subject expertise (e.g., scholarship), societal position (e.g., public office or title), or special experience (e.g., participating in a historic event); Ways of thinking Select information sources that provide the greatest authority for the situation and need. Whether in the library or classroom, strategies such as the Think Aloud model make expert (librarian) thinking visible. Students need to know the “why” behind the selection of information sources for various situations. This requires A LOT of exposure and practice across multiple courses. Embedding the library in all core courses can go a long way here.
Use research tools and indicators of authority to determine the credibility of sources Information Technology Fluency, Ways of Thinking This knowledge practice describes “knowing in action” Inquiry-based learning strategies such as WebQuests can be used to practice this skill.  Within disciplinary areas, literature reviews further hone it. Most importantly, assessment and feedback of the quality of cited sources in research assignments across courses is necessary to motivate students toward this knowledge practice.
Understand that many disciplines have acknowledged authorities…

some scholars would challenge the authority of those sources

 

Ways of Thinking; Communication Participate in the debate and discussion of scholarly topics with divergent research perspectives. Debating controversial topics in the classroom or in online course discussions exposes students to the divergent perspectives that often occur in various disciplines. This also helps familiarize them with the primary authorities in the field. Note: Debate is much more effective at developing this knowledge practice than the more commonplace research papers on hot topics. Why? Because when students know they have to perform in front of their peers, they are more motivated to take it seriously (you can’t copy and paste a debate!).
Recognize that authoritative content may be packaged formally or informally and may include sources of all media types

 

Ways of Thinking Select information sources that provide the greatest authority for the situation and need. Think Aloud strategies work well for this knowledge practice too.
Acknowledge they are developing their own authoritative voices in a particular area and recognize

the responsibilities this entails, including seeking accuracy and reliability, respecting intellectual

property, and participating in communities of practice;

 

Ways of Thinking; Communication Maintain a wiki, blog, or other platform to share reflections, thoughts, and analyses of scholarly work in a given discipline, field, or research area. Ultimately, writing about one’s research interests is the best strategy for developing an authoritative voice, as well as a better understanding of the discipline or field. Even more so, sharing one’s ideas with other scholars or practitioners in the field does wonders in fostering this knowledge practice. I know this from personal experience;)
Understand the increasingly social nature of the information ecosystem

 

Communication Follow the social media platforms (e.g., blogs, Twitter, Facebook) of scholarly authorities to keep abreast of research in progress. Getting students to follow their instructors’ blogs and other informal scholarly writings on the web is a great introduction to this knowledge practice. In doing so, students will become natural participants in the ever-evolving social, scholarly ecosystem as they enter their chosen fields of study.
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s